CHEMICALS CURRENTLY
UNDER REVIEW
SPINOX T and GRANOX TBC
DRAFTING GROUP MEMBERS:
Mr.
Ikeda
Mr.
Untung
Mr.
Palikhe
Mr.
Sibartie
Mr.
Cable
Mr.
Komives
Ms.
Yang
Ms.
N’doye
Mr.
Debois
Mr.
Ward
Mr.
Arndt
Mr.
Mayne
Secretariat
Coordinator:
Ms. Barnes
Coordinator:
Mr. Ammati
Secertariat: Bill Murray
RATIONALE:
Rationale For And Text Of The Draft Recommendation
That Spinox T And Granox Tbc Should Become Subject To The Prior Informed
Consent Procedure And To Establish An Intersessional Drafting Group To
Prepare A Draft Decision Guidance Document (excerpt from
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC3/CRP.18)
a)
The
reliability of the evidence indicating that the use of the formulations, in
accordance with common or recognized patterns of use within the proposing party
result in the reported incidents.
The reported poisoning incidents were well
documented, documents available were
the completed incident report forms, a separate epidemiological study
undertaken by representatives of the Senegalese government, the World Health
Organization and others. They were
further supported by information on the individual active ingredients collected
from internationally recognized sources.
In reviewing this documentation there was
concern that the onset of symptoms was not consistent with carbamate
intoxication, given that it appeared that the majority of symptoms, including
mortalities, occurred 45 to 120 days after the first exposure. However, it was recognized that this may be
an artifact of the way in which the data were reported and probably reflected
the time from when users first started applying the formulation, rather than
the time between the last exposure and the onset of symptoms. In all cases, a precise link between the
time of exposure and the onset of symptoms was difficult to establish. The reasons include: the data were collected
retrospectively; the principal exposure occurred during sowing of treated
seeds, an activity that takes place over a period of 5 to 10 days and may occur
from May through August; and, written records of pesticide use are not
typically maintained in the region.
However, in some cases symptoms were reported from within a few hours to
two days after exposure.
It was also noted that symptoms reported did
not reflect the full range of those typically associated with cholinesterase
inhibition. For carbamates, such
symptoms as miosis and excess salivation are typically of short duration. Given that the data were collected some time
after exposure, those symptoms would not be expected to be observed. In addition, it was noted that the forms
used to collect the data may have influenced
the symptoms reported, since it did not list the full range of symptoms
representative of cholinesterase inhibition.
The reported respiratory problems were considered to be indicative of
lung oedema, normally a symptom of severe carbamate poisoning , and possibly a
pre-condition to the reported limb oedemas.
In addition supplementary information relevant to the nature and scope of
the illness related to the use of the formulations was not available due to
inadequate record keeping. In health centers and posts in the region.
In the design of the supporting epidemiological
study there was a potentially confounding case controls selection, in that the
controls may have also been exposed to pesticides. It was determined that while this was a potential weakness in the
study it should not lead to discounting
the overall results. The reasons for this include the following:
“ There was no difference between cases and
controls regarding their participation in farm-work. None-the-less the distribution of sick cases in space and time
shows that they were concentrated in the peanut farming areas soon after the
beginning of the rainy season and during the season of agricultural labor, with
a major peak in August when all farmers started or ended sowing….. In addition most controls were less exposed
because they were ill during the period of sowing.” (Page 18, para 3).
The reported incidents
were limited to the Kolda region of Senegal.
It was noted that other regions where it had been expected that the
formulations would be used had not received the pesticide, and in those regions
no incidents of poisoning had been recorded.
Kolda was the region in which it was also reported
that as a result of a new agricultural policy there was an increase in the
yield of peanuts associated with more intensive farming practices. This increased intensity of production was
associated with increased pesticide use.
It was reported that associated with the increased peanut production the
quantities of pesticides available to farmers doubled and even tripled. (page
17 para 5.4.3).
It was confirmed that the 22 incident reports
considered by the Committee involved exposure to the Spinox/Granox formulations
only. In addition a representative
from PAN Africa confirmed that the
Spinox T and Granox TBC were the only pesticide formulations directly available
to farmers in the region. This
information was considered to reinforce the link between exposure to these
formulations and the observed effects.
While it was recognized that there some
elements of the data available to the Committee could be challenged, it was
agreed that the overall weight of evidence clearly indicated that the use of
the formulations in accordance with common and recognized practices within
Senegal resulted in the reported incidents.
b)
The relevance of such incidents to other States with similar climate
conditions an patterns of use of the formulation;
It was agreed that the information about the
reported incidents and the formulation was relevant to other Parties
particularly those with similar climatic conditions and levels of awareness
among agricultural workers and that are producing peanuts using similar
cropping systems.
c)
The existence of handling or applicator restrictions involving
technology or techniques that may not be reasonably or widely applied in states
lacking he necessary infrastructure.
Information on restrictions about this specific
formulation is not available. However
for carbofuran, most formulations are retricted to trained personal wearing
suitable protective clothing (e.g. protective impermeable boots, clean overall,
gloves and a respirator or other technology designed to minimize applicator
exposure such as closed cabs or closed systems of mixing, loading and
application). It was also noted that
based on the request for information on these formulations no powdered
formulations of carbofuran were approved in 25 countries or the European
Community.
It was agreed that such techniques and
technologies considered necessary to reduce exposure to acceptable levels in
developed countries would not be expected to be available or feasible in
developing countries lacking the necessary infrastructure and with a hot and
humid climate.
d)
The significance of reported effects in relation to the quantity of
pesticide used;
The reported effects included mortality and
were observed with increased frequency in the region where there was increased
use of the formulations.
e)
The intentional misuse is not in itself an adequate reason to list a
formulation in Annex III
The incidents reported were not the result of
intentional misuse but occurred as a result of using the formulations in
accordance with common or recognized practices in Senegal.
SCHEDULE FOR SPIMOX T AND GRANOC TBC
Tasks
to be carried out, responsible persons, and deadlines:
Task |
Responsible persons |
Deadline |
|
Draft a single “internal proposal” on Spinox
T and Granox TBC based on the information available to ICRC-3. |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
15 May 2002 |
|
Send draft “internal proposal” to group
members for comments via e-mail. |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
15 May 2002 |
|
Replies |
All DG members |
15 June 2002 |
|
Update “internal proposal” based on the comments
from group members. |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
15 July 2002 |
|
Send updated “internal proposal” to the ICRC
and its observers for comments via e-mail |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
15 July 2002 |
|
Replies |
All ICRC members and observers |
1 September 2002 |
|
Draft a decision guidance document (DGD)
based on the comments from the ICRC and its observers |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
1 October 2002 |
|
Send draft DGD to group members for comments
via e-mail |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
1 October 2002 |
|
Replies |
All DG members |
22 October 2002. |
|
Finalize draft DGD based on the comments of
the group. |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
1 November 2002 |
|
Send the draft DGD to secretariat |
Cathleen Barnes and Mohamed Ammati |
1 November 2002 |
|
ICRC meeting |
|
March 2003 |
RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FOR THE WORK OF THE DRAFTING
GROUP
|
Code
of Document |
Name
of the document |
Comments |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/CRP.16: |
Working paper on the content of a DGD for
severely hazardous pesticide formulations causing human health problems |
Copy attached in Appendix III |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/17 |
Inclusion of Chemicals in the Interim Prior
Informed Consent Procedure: Review of Proposals for severely hazardous
pesticide formulations – Granox TBC and Spinox T |
Incident report forms (Parts A and B) for both
Granox TBC and Spinox T and summaries in English |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/17.Add.1 |
Inclusion of Chemicals in the Interim Prior
Informed Consent Procedure: Review of Proposals for severely hazardous
pesticide formulations – Granox TBC and Spinox T |
Additional information collected by the
Secretariat: DNAs who responded to the request for
additional information, calculation on toxicity values, translation of
labels, extract of information provided by PAN Africa, JMPR reviews,
Pesticide Data Sheets, International Chemical Safety Cards, EXTOXNET
Profiles. |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/17.Add.2 |
Inclusion of Chemicals in the Interim Prior
Informed Consent Procedure: Review of Proposals for severely hazardous
pesticide formulations – Granox TBC and Spinox T |
Additional information collected by the
Secretariat: Comments from Crop Life International |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/17.Add.3 |
Inclusion of Chemicals in the Interim Prior
Informed Consent Procedure: Review of Proposals for severely hazardous
pesticide formulations – Granox TBC and Spinox T |
Additional information collected by the
Secretariat: DNAs who responded to the request for
additional information, report of the research on the epidemic of an unknown
etiologic illness in Kolda, comments from Crop Life International |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/CRP.6: |
Review of proposals for severely hazardous pesticide
formulation- Comments received from the representative designated by the
United States of America |
Comments received from the representative designated
by the United States of America |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/CRP.15: |
Report of the drafting group on Granox TBC
and Spinox T |
Includes membership and workplan |
|
UNEP/FAO/PIC/ICRC.3/CRP.18: |
Rationale for and text of the draft
recommendation that Spinox T and Granox TBC become subject to the PIC
procedure and to establish an intersessional drafting group to prepare a
draft decision guidance document |
Rationale for draft recommendation on GRANOX TBC and
SPINOX T |