The amendments to list carbofuran, trichlorfon, short-chain chlorinated paraffins and tributyltin compounds enter into force on 15 September 2017. Parties are invited to provide import responses by 15 June 2018.

Documents	English	French	Spanish
Dispatch of Decision Guidance Documents and request for submission of import responses on carbofuran; trichlorfon; short-chain chlorinated paraffins; and tributyltin compounds
Decision Guidance Document for carbofuran
Decision Guidance Document for trichlorfon
Decision Guidance Document for short-chain chlorinated paraffins
Decision Guidance Document for tributyltin compounds
Depositary notification on the amendments
Import response form
Instructions on completing the import response form

Global Context

In her opening speech recently at the High-Level Segment of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions’ Triple COPs Ms. Maria Helena Semedo, FAO Deputy Director-General,Climate and Natural Resources, reiterated the message that “Food is the most basic human right, yet nearly 800 million people still suffer from hunger in the world. For the most part, they live in rural areas of developing countries and are involved in agriculture. Half a billion smallholder farmers ‐who produce 80 percent of the food supply in their countries – are struggling to make a living. The world’s poor and hungry are most vulnerable to the adverse effects of hazardous pesticides, chemicals and wastes that are the focus of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions. Growth in the agriculture sector remains one of the most cost‐effective means for developing nations to reduce poverty and end food insecurity”.

The project

The Rotterdam Convention Secretariat started its cooperation with Lusophone African countries – Países Africanos de Língua Oficial Portuguesa (PALOP) in 2016. In 2016 and 2017 technical assistance activities on hazardous pesticide formulations, pesticide poisoning, and vulnerable groups were carried out in Cabo Verde, Guinea Bissau and Sao Tome and Principe.

In March 2017, the General Direction of Agriculture, Forestry and Livestock (DGASP) of the Ministry of Agriculture and of the Environment of Cabo Verde officially requested technical assistance support to promote the use of alternatives to hazardous pesticides and start the process of strengthening Farmers Field Schools for irrigated agriculture and for vegetable crops in the archipelago.

Fulfilling this request, Nadia Correale, Social Protection and Community Development specialist of the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat based in Rome, undertook a mission in Cabo Verde from 25 June to 2 July 2017 in the framework of a European Union project for the implementation of the Convention. A component of this project is explicitly dedicated to the collect and use of good field data as a solid base for rational policy decisions.

Farmers were interviewed on their experience with Integrated Pest Management and with Farmers’ Field Schools (FFS) as a form of association of rural communities and as potential best tool to continue to use IPM approach. An intial map of main crops and areas, agronomic technics and a crops calendar was prepared as the basis to understand how to strengthen the national capacity in using less pesticides and introducing alternatives with the limited funds available.

What are Farmers Field Schools?

FFS are open air schools based on the following principle:

“If I hear it I forget it,
if I see it I remember it,
if I discover it I own it for life”.

FFS focus on basic processes through field observations, season-long research studies, and hands-on activities. It has been found that when farmers have learned about basics, combined with their own experiences and needs, they make decisions that are more effective. The final aim is to grow healthy crops, conserve natural enemies of the main pests, observe fields and crops regularly, based on the premise that farmers are the best experts.

The Rotterdam Convention works on the identification of alternatives to the use of hazardous pesticides, thus IPM and FFS are very efficient tools among smallholder farmers and rural communities in general. One part of the RC Secretariat is based in FAO in order to make the best use of the long time expertise in pesticides risk reduction, IPM and participatory approaches among agricultural communities. A FFS Guide has been prepared by FAO in 2016 and now is available also in Portuguese, click here to download the guide.

The Rotterdam Convention Secretariat continues its efforts to make agriculture more sustainable by contributing to detoxifying the soil, the water, and the air from hazardous substances such as pesticides with the final overarching objective to protect both human health and the environment.

The Rotterdam Convention is based on information exchange on hazardous chemicals and pesticides. This includes informing on any bans or restrictions taken by Parties on a national basis through a final regulatory action. Evaluating for example the risk of pesticides and taking an informed decision can be quite challenging for some countries for many reasons such as availability of data, resources and others.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has developed a Pesticide Registration Toolkit, which can be used as a decision support system. It provides for example links to many pesticide-specific information sources such as registrations in various countries, scientific reviews, hazard classifications, pesticide properties among others. It further provides guidance on assessment methods and an inventory of risk mitigation measures. All of this can be of great value for Designated National Authorities to evaluate the risk and take a decision whether to ban or severely restrict the use of a pesticide, to decide on future import of an Annex III pesticide, or to collect evidence on a potential severely hazardous pesticide formulation (SHPF).

Hosted on FAO’s website, a link has been made available here to offer this support also to the Parties of the Rotterdam Convention.

On 22nd -23rd June 2017, in parallel to the June session of the Human Rights Council, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment, Prof. John Knox, held consultations on children’s rights and the environment, in view of his next report to the Human Rights Council, at which the BRS Secretariat contributed. These consultations were co-organised by the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR), UNICEF and Terre des Hommes.

Whereas human rights law imposes specific duties on States with respect to those particularly vulnerable to environmental harm, children being among the most vulnerable; the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions aim at “protecting human health and the environment” against harmful effects of hazardous chemicals and wastes. These objectives are crucial as the World Health Organization estimates, in its recent 2017 reports, that of the 5.9 million deaths of children under five each year, 26% are attributable to environmental causes, including due to unsound management of hazardous chemicals and wastes. Air pollution alone kills 570,000 children under five every year. Unhealthy environments interfere with the enjoyment of many fundamental rights enshrined in essential long-standing UN legal instruments – e.g. the UN Charter, the 1948 Universal Declaration on Human Rights, the 1966 Covenants on civil and political rights and on economic and social rights, the 1992 Convention on the Rights of the Child, etc.: these rights include right to life, health and development, as well as many other rights, such as rights to housing, food, and clean water, etc. Climate change, as well as the unsound management of hazardous chemicals and wastes, poses a threat to the realization of many if not all of the rights enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Negotiated well after the rise of the environmental movement, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, now with 191 Parties, is one of the few human rights instruments that explicitly require States to take steps to protect the environment for children. The threat of environmental harm indeed affects children today and future generations.

For more information:
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Environment/SREnvironment/Pages/SRenvironmentIndex.aspx